Friday, August 2, 2013

Why abortion clinics closing should not make you smile.

Now although abortion kill more than children per year. We need to realize that closing those clinics will not change a thing. Why I say this? Well Let's look at the law of supply and demand shall we?

Picture by Cornerstone AD
Fetus Picture by Cornerstone AD









The law of supply and demand is defined here:

Law of supply and demand from Investopedia website

     This states that the competition and the supply will decrease the cost of production. The product is the surgery and the competition are other abortion clinics. Therefore, In the united states, the products decline per abortion clinic being closed and the competition declines as well. This increases the price per abortion dramatically. What's more?

     The Regulations, certifications on products, or any decrease in time of production also make the price increase more so. Essentially, if you expend your supply fast you have to increase production fast. But regulations decrease the expenditure of supply causing slow production. Slow production causes supply to be low and low supply causes low high prices per item.


     Even twitter (reported by Lifenews), one of the most popular communication programs ever invented has user-made campaigns that are also in favor of closing abortion clinics through pro-lifers (a term that is ).

     Now, there are different ways that consumers could ignore this crisis by going to different countries where the economics are very different, however, many people complain about the safety of international clinics. Nevertheless the clinics that are closing are not going to decrease the demand of the abortions. What's more, is that we only know that the prices of the abortion is going to cost more making people look for other options which maybe vary from home-made abortion potions to self sterilization (This may sound weird but many countries, including the United States, do this and more.)

     The good in this is that maybe the higher prices will make abortions less likely as an option and young females will maybe think before getting pregnant to a person. There's plenty of options of "getting rid of a baby" besides abortion. Adoption, foster-parenting, and natural and modern birth control methods are all fair-game but not widely known to the American public.

Please feel free to comment below about the topic

Blog Updates & New content

Hello viewers, this month I will be sure to enhance this website and publish great information about politics on this website. Please feel free to check this webpage for more updates to come....

More content will be published for this year and more traffic will enter this website. I will cater to the political content to the viewers and their opinions so please comment to let me know what political information you would like to know! Thanks for visiting!

Monday, September 3, 2012

$500k of Stimulus money went to adverts to Oberman and Maddow

Cartoon from Gleen Foden.  (Source: mrc.org)
$500,000 of stimulus funds went to advertisements on Keith Oberman and Rachel Maddow. This is frightening and completely absurd. Now many mainstream media already raped this event and supported the fact the many people did not call in the adverts, yet, no one said that this was an illegal action that the government (Not only "Liberals" or the Obama administration). Putting a name on an action leads to blaming one person instead of blaming one section of the political system.


     The real problem is that no jobs were "created". But why would stimulus money create jobs when it is only temporarily "bandage" until the economy increases. Therefore, the extra money (which should be spent to stimulate economy) then the economy should be at equilibrium. Now, I won't debate the criticisms of Keynes or Milton Friedman's income hypothesis. I'll state why the stimulus was used incorrectly and what it will mean.

     This is a way that the government can NOT blame the population for the economic downturn. We (the American people) did not accept the bad debt trading or fractional reserve trading. We only "went along" with the government's ideas because "we say its just politics or we think we cant do it". Also we were too busy while in school or at work to even bother. So we sat and wait and wait. Then when we realize what happened as long as we have shelter and food to eat we say to our TV screens "You did this"!.

     Did that scenario play a tune to your ears? Well, the stimulus was spent on ads and should get you upset at yourself for not complaining to the government bureaucrats, congress, and maybe even wall street. We need to stop blaming others and blame ourselves for not taming the corrupt government. So we let them use our own stimulus for ads.

Stimulus money is defined by Investopedia as:

The definition of Stimulus package definition. (Source: Investopedia)

     The reason this is happening? The illegal (or unconventional) stimulus money could have been used this way to make us (American people) more dependent on the government. Although many media stations reported on it as being a legitimate stimulus because Ads will get people calling and then there will be people working. This is very much like a "Indirect" stimulus, if that makes any sense and was from the tax payers pocket!


Washington Times reported:
"Spending reports under the federal Recovery Act show $495,000 paid to McNeely Pigott & Fox Public Relations LLC, which the Labor Department hired to raise awareness “among employers and influencers about the [Job Corps] program’s existing and new training initiatives in high growth and environmentally friendly career areas” as well as spreading the word to prospective Job Corps enrollees."
     So the editor of this article, Jim McElhatton, did not even state that job corps allows only youths between the ages of 16-24 this is a terrible information to leave out. Because it renders the stimulus useless to older aged people. Plus, if you read deeper the article only played the advertisement about 112 times (based on their calculations). 

     What is most sickening about this event is that it would take more longer for those youths to find jobs and is only a temporary placement where they reside in a place using "tax payers dollars" to learn about a job and go to a job if they successfully complete it! But wait that's not all! There's a waiting list which all youths need to be on in order to join, sometimes the waiting list takes nearly a year till you're in the program. Then it takes 3 to 2 years to complete! This means that this is nothing like a stimulus at all! Here's the job corps' webpage and where some of the information is found (in case there are skeptics that are too lazy to search).

     What will this mean? Less money for us (American citizens) and more poverty. This will also mean more arguing against political parties and how one is more corrupt than the other. In the Washington Time's article David Williams, President of the nonprofit watchdog Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA), smelled corruption by stating:

“Hiring a PR firm does not create jobs, and this was obviously meant for selling a particular political agenda,” Mr. Williams said. “The placement really reeks of a political ad rather than a job ad, and taxpayers see through this.

     Instead of playing politics with the political parties one must use their personal experiences and understand that this kind of corruption will NEVER stop unless one stops playing the parties rules and use their own independent thinking instead of group thinking. So, stop watching mainstream media (video games and some books) and stop listening to the radio until you can decipher their lies. Until then, read a book about something and criticize its view points and make your own opinion about the book. Thus, you can have the ability to look through a different viewpoint, make your own opinion, and research the facts yourself.


Saturday, September 1, 2012

Mouse borne virus ANOTHER LIE by the sick Media and their corporations.

Let's talk about this "Mouse borne" "Park virus" namely, Hantavirus. Now, I am not a virologist but to claim that large numbers of people (10,000 to be exact) are threatened by mouse virus that "pops" out of nowhere in the Yosemite national park is absolutely stupid.  The Hantavirus was diagnoses in 1993 and is similar to West Nile but develops a disease called Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS). HPS is similar to any flu but is caused by being exposed to rat droppings, feces, urine, etc. Fortunately, this virus does not spread from human to human. First let's talk about their strategy, define a virus, and hunt for mouse virus in the past:



     The media claims thousands of people are at risk while only 2 died and reports of 6 are staying in hospital due to illness from the disease, yet they claim 10,000 are at risk. This means that the mainstream media is hyping this to let people react to their fear, thus they provide a solution. Hegelian Dialectic: "Problem - Reaction - Solution" (A warfare tactic to get to create the problem and solution of the problem). I will outline how the Hegelian Dialectic is used in today's media and how it is used to get whatever outcome they want.



Let's go to Webster's dictionary and find out what is a virus...
Virus, mouse, illness, death, hantavirus, sick
Definition of a Virus. Source: Merriam-Websters


     This means that the virus in question could be diseased caused by a virus, a side effect of a biological agent, or a living virus. Now let's assume that the government wants us to stay away from the parks due to the virus, would that really help? Mice can travel to any home and create niches in about anywhere. But for some reason they must shut down and cripple California's economy more and put the Agenda 21 plan into action. Next thing you know the government will allow spraying the entire place with chemicals like what was done during the West Nile "outbreak" of August 2012 in the US.

Take a look back in the past ( May 4th 94' to be exact) where the second death was recorded in1994 by NY times article (LET ME REPEAT--- SECOND DEATH!):

New,york,times,2nd,death,illness,1994,article,rare
SEE how they report mispell but still mean to state "2ND man dies from RARE illness"
     If this is not a smoking gun then I DO NOT know what is! Its plainly obvious that this article clearly states that it is: #1 very very rare to catch the disease and #2 it's extremely rare to die by it although the media claims it has a 36% death rate. This should lead one to believe that the Hegelian dialectic is being used to cause a problem in order to create a solution!


They create the problem which is a virus and then...the reaction is fear:

" At least six rangers staffed phones this week at Yosemite National Park as visitors frightened about a growing outbreak of a deadly mouse-borne virus flooded lines seeking answers.
More than 1,000 calls a day are coming into the park, many from visitors wondering if they're in danger of contracting or being exposed to hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, park spokesman Scott Gediman said.
"We're reaching out and they are reaching out to us and we are trying in every way shape and form to be transparent and forthright," Gediman said. "We want to tell people this is what we know. The most important thing is the safety of park visitors and employees."(source: ABCLOCAL)

     After fear is pushed the move on to a solution. Solutions may appear to be solution but may actually be a worse solution (problematic solution).  For example, let's say that this virus is a danger to society and is caused by global warming and it requires a solution immediately so the us government rushes the military to put civilians into camps for a brief period of time. As that happens many people begin to starve due to over crowding and competition, therefore this solution is now a problematic solution and calls for another solution to be created in order for this solution to be resolved. This is the essence of Hegelian dialectic.

     Let's use Paul Rauber's report as an example... Fake environmentalists or environmental activists such as Paul Rauber, and its entire website (Sierra club) is possibly a government-paid organization used to push "false-ideas and lies" in order to provide a "solution" that is not needed. The solution may require another solution due to the problems that arrive from the first solution.

Here's a snippet his report:




     So now that we understand the Hegelian dialectic and how it being played in this media report, understand that this has been used by many governments for centuries and can even be used in interpersonal relationships. It's being played in the media everyday as they scare you with the Hantavirus, tuberculosis, West Nile, and even terrorism; and they want you to beg and call them for a solution.

     Here is  search that I pulled up earlier today and It shows that the mainstream media are jumping on the "problem" probably to find a "Solution". There are possibly a number of solutions but they will ignore the people's opinion and facts just to do what they want to do.

fear mongering media


     If you understood this information please share this with anyone you know and let the know that this is a lie (falsified danger) and is only here to scare you into asking for a solution from the same people who created the problem (Once they mention it, it becomes a problem).